Amazing, but this 1997 paper already shows what (and why) we can learn from observational studies about the bounds of treatment effects in a randomized experiment marred by non-compliance👇🏻The rest is just a history of the neglect by the EBM promoters. #causaltwitter
Glad you mentioned "non-compliance". Indeed, this was one of the first tasks addressed and solved in do-calculus. See ucla.in/2pQ0Gvr. The paper also includes applications to real-life data -- pacifying those who claim such applications are missing from CI literature.
Yes, it's a good paper. Alex Balke was one of my best students, and this paper was part of his PhD dissertation. Too bad he did not go to academia.
It continues to amaze me how much we had by 1997, when I started at Queen's, yet we still haven’t used in 2023. Have these 3 decades been spent on coming to terms (as if it wasn't known before) that EBM truthers and their truth container can't compete with the scientific method?
United States Trends
- 1. #SurvivorSeries 116K posts
- 2. Auburn 19.5K posts
- 3. Liv Morgan 25.5K posts
- 4. Vandy 15.8K posts
- 5. Bama 18.5K posts
- 6. John Cena 29.3K posts
- 7. Nikki 33.5K posts
- 8. Ty Simpson 1,929 posts
- 9. Roxanne 6,131 posts
- 10. Oklahoma 32.6K posts
- 11. Norvell 5,296 posts
- 12. Rhea 19.6K posts
- 13. Lash Legend 6,901 posts
- 14. Stephanie Vaquer 7,241 posts
- 15. Heupel 3,281 posts
- 16. #RollTide 2,287 posts
- 17. Tennessee 44.9K posts
- 18. Mateer 8,065 posts
- 19. Tim Banks 3,260 posts
- 20. Dirty Dom 1,413 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.