Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States 趋势
- 1. Good Sunday 56K posts
- 2. #sundayvibes 4,603 posts
- 3. Louvre 50.7K posts
- 4. #ProofOfFortification 2,186 posts
- 5. $GIGGLE 2,597 posts
- 6. Nico Paz 12.2K posts
- 7. #AskBetr N/A
- 8. Woodstock 3,753 posts
- 9. #AskFFT N/A
- 10. O God 10.5K posts
- 11. Jacobs 4,049 posts
- 12. PERTHSANTA DIMENSION BEAUTY 641K posts
- 13. Liverpool 105K posts
- 14. Full PPR N/A
- 15. Lott 1,107 posts
- 16. #COYS 1,253 posts
- 17. Stanford 13K posts
- 18. Blessed Sunday 15.6K posts
- 19. Norvell 5,105 posts
- 20. Rafah 63.2K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.