Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States トレンド
- 1. Arsenal 315K posts
- 2. Russ 30.1K posts
- 3. Martinelli 34.3K posts
- 4. White House 484K posts
- 5. Lakers 39.9K posts
- 6. NASA 72.7K posts
- 7. Atlas 61.4K posts
- 8. Crosby 8,768 posts
- 9. Atletico 119K posts
- 10. Platner 11.2K posts
- 11. #COYG 6,738 posts
- 12. Simeone 23.5K posts
- 13. Warriors 56.9K posts
- 14. John Brennan 29.2K posts
- 15. Woody Johnson 2,659 posts
- 16. Napoli 32.3K posts
- 17. Gyokeres 44.2K posts
- 18. $BYND 154K posts
- 19. Rashford 67.4K posts
- 20. Sean Payton 2,143 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.