Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Tren
- 1. Texans 38.1K posts
- 2. World Series 113K posts
- 3. CJ Stroud 6,794 posts
- 4. Blue Jays 97.5K posts
- 5. Mariners 93.6K posts
- 6. Seahawks 37K posts
- 7. Springer 68.3K posts
- 8. Nick Caley 2,678 posts
- 9. White House 317K posts
- 10. StandX 4,847 posts
- 11. Dan Wilson 4,338 posts
- 12. Nico Collins 2,150 posts
- 13. Sanae Takaichi 40.1K posts
- 14. Dodgers in 5 2,266 posts
- 15. LA Knight 8,434 posts
- 16. #WWERaw 62.1K posts
- 17. Kenneth Walker 2,596 posts
- 18. Bazardo 3,200 posts
- 19. Demeco 1,829 posts
- 20. Sam Darnold 4,380 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.