Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States 趨勢
- 1. #DWTS 13.3K posts
- 2. Chet 13.4K posts
- 3. Rockets 38.8K posts
- 4. Whitney 8,514 posts
- 5. Robert 112K posts
- 6. #NBAonNBC 2,044 posts
- 7. Shai 16.6K posts
- 8. Alix 3,242 posts
- 9. Reed Sheppard 1,715 posts
- 10. Sengun 4,779 posts
- 11. #WWENXT 8,857 posts
- 12. Amen Thompson 3,962 posts
- 13. Kevin Durant 14.9K posts
- 14. Michael Jordan 9,274 posts
- 15. #ThunderUp 3,534 posts
- 16. Brad Marchand 6,723 posts
- 17. Tari Eason 1,373 posts
- 18. Ajay Mitchell N/A
- 19. Mike Tirico 1,841 posts
- 20. Russ 32.4K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.