Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Trends
- 1. Friendly 59.1K posts
- 2. SNAP 664K posts
- 3. Big Dom 1,222 posts
- 4. Jessica 27.2K posts
- 5. Jamaica 105K posts
- 6. RIP Beef 1,504 posts
- 7. Riley Gaines 29.1K posts
- 8. Sonic Prime N/A
- 9. Mazie 1,050 posts
- 10. 53 Republicans 3,569 posts
- 11. #JUNGKOOKXCALVINKLEIN 13.5K posts
- 12. Stearns N/A
- 13. MRIs 5,306 posts
- 14. Runza N/A
- 15. Sports Equinox 11.6K posts
- 16. Crash Bandicoot 4,787 posts
- 17. Antoan Richardson N/A
- 18. Perk 5,432 posts
- 19. John Dickerson 2,794 posts
- 20. Hurricane Melissa 62.8K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.
