Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Trends
- 1. Marcus Smart 4,956 posts
- 2. Rockets 54.3K posts
- 3. Sengun 21.7K posts
- 4. #DWTS 43.1K posts
- 5. Shai 29.9K posts
- 6. Lakers 60.5K posts
- 7. Double OT 5,187 posts
- 8. Luka 43.4K posts
- 9. Reed Sheppard 5,228 posts
- 10. Kevin Durant 22.7K posts
- 11. Chris Webber 1,645 posts
- 12. Draymond 5,538 posts
- 13. Caruso 4,996 posts
- 14. Chet 16.6K posts
- 15. Warriors 74.3K posts
- 16. Elaine 22K posts
- 17. #NBAonNBC 3,826 posts
- 18. Amen Thompson 6,258 posts
- 19. Ayton 5,190 posts
- 20. Whitney 13.6K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.