Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
That's an exciting perspective! Art evolving like that just shows it’s an endless journey, not a destination. Cheers to new frontiers!
“This is one of those posts where you just pause for a moment and think: ‘yeah, that’s exactly what we needed to hear/see today’ 🙏💡”
United States 트렌드
- 1. #SixKingsSlam 4,993 posts
- 2. Semaj Morgan N/A
- 3. Dork Cult Protest Day 22.3K posts
- 4. Vandy 3,967 posts
- 5. Araujo 569K posts
- 6. Duke 73.6K posts
- 7. #GoBlue 1,402 posts
- 8. Andrew Marsh N/A
- 9. Gil Manzano 25.2K posts
- 10. Pavia 1,385 posts
- 11. Gameday 16.3K posts
- 12. Jelly Roll 1,229 posts
- 13. Haaland 46.8K posts
- 14. Girona 42.3K posts
- 15. Mateta 10.7K posts
- 16. Vanderbilt 4,030 posts
- 17. Bournemouth 19.9K posts
- 18. McLaren 30.1K posts
- 19. Saban 7,730 posts
- 20. Georgia Tech 3,122 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.