Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Trends
- 1. Vandy 11.3K posts
- 2. No Kings 927K posts
- 3. Brian Kelly 5,593 posts
- 4. Carnell Tate 2,850 posts
- 5. Diego Pavia 3,606 posts
- 6. Vanderbilt 9,011 posts
- 7. Beamer 2,836 posts
- 8. Clark Lea N/A
- 9. South Carolina 11K posts
- 10. Tony Vitello 2,559 posts
- 11. Dork Cult Protest Day 42.7K posts
- 12. Shula 2,498 posts
- 13. Nuss 3,337 posts
- 14. #GoBlue 2,586 posts
- 15. Joe Sloan 1,067 posts
- 16. Sellers 10K posts
- 17. Marchand 2,430 posts
- 18. Tulane 1,983 posts
- 19. Duke 65K posts
- 20. Constitutional Republic 17.5K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.