Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States トレンド
- 1. Mariners 69.5K posts
- 2. Blue Jays 60.6K posts
- 3. George Springer 29K posts
- 4. #WWERaw 52.6K posts
- 5. Baker 34.7K posts
- 6. Dan Wilson 3,085 posts
- 7. Texans 23.7K posts
- 8. #ALCS 9,050 posts
- 9. Mike Evans 14.2K posts
- 10. Lions 88.1K posts
- 11. Munoz 9,124 posts
- 12. Gibbs 22.8K posts
- 13. Bazardo 2,097 posts
- 14. LA Knight 5,984 posts
- 15. Jeff Hoffman 1,886 posts
- 16. White House 270K posts
- 17. Bucs 22.5K posts
- 18. Kendrick 15K posts
- 19. CJ Stroud 2,545 posts
- 20. Seahawks 23.1K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.