Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Trends
- 1. Don Lemon 4,824 posts
- 2. SNAP 1.02M posts
- 3. Jamaica 275K posts
- 4. $NVDA 86.6K posts
- 5. #LumioseOOTD N/A
- 6. Alcaraz 7,985 posts
- 7. Nelson 30.9K posts
- 8. #MarcelReed N/A
- 9. Riley Gaines 108K posts
- 10. Luke Kwon N/A
- 11. New World 94.2K posts
- 12. Norrie 4,478 posts
- 13. Wikipedia 129K posts
- 14. Tucker 104K posts
- 15. Fuentes 83.9K posts
- 16. #NationalFirstRespondersDay 1,635 posts
- 17. Western Union 6,852 posts
- 18. Jensen 12.6K posts
- 19. Queen Latifah 1,573 posts
- 20. Amare 2,657 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.