Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States 趨勢
- 1. #AEWWrestleDream 54.2K posts
- 2. Lincoln Riley 2,480 posts
- 3. Mizzou 5,521 posts
- 4. Kentucky 24.9K posts
- 5. Hugh Freeze 2,427 posts
- 6. Stoops 4,799 posts
- 7. Arch 25.6K posts
- 8. #RollTide 8,195 posts
- 9. Bama 15.4K posts
- 10. Sark 4,384 posts
- 11. Tennessee 53.5K posts
- 12. Notre Dame 15.7K posts
- 13. Texas 171K posts
- 14. #UFCVancouver 28.8K posts
- 15. Heupel 2,817 posts
- 16. Utah 29.1K posts
- 17. No Kings 1.74M posts
- 18. #BYUFOOTBALL 1,027 posts
- 19. Missouri 8,196 posts
- 20. #GoIrish 5,627 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.