Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Trendy
- 1. Amazon 605K posts
- 2. Melo 12.1K posts
- 3. Diwali 1.02M posts
- 4. Christian Braun 2,404 posts
- 5. Canvas 21.6K posts
- 6. East Wing 9,205 posts
- 7. Danya 3,120 posts
- 8. Kenny Loggins 7,227 posts
- 9. #ONEPIECE1163 4,632 posts
- 10. National Guard to Portland 7,383 posts
- 11. 9th Circuit 2,085 posts
- 12. West Ham 17.7K posts
- 13. $ZIG 1,823 posts
- 14. Dyson Daniels 1,778 posts
- 15. Kandi 3,137 posts
- 16. Stephen A 30.9K posts
- 17. Thibs N/A
- 18. FanDuel 15.1K posts
- 19. Garp 2,448 posts
- 20. Daniel Naroditsky 3,986 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.