Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Trends
- 1. Halo 123K posts
- 2. PlayStation 57.6K posts
- 3. $BIEBER N/A
- 4. Xbox 71.7K posts
- 5. #WorldSeries 54.9K posts
- 6. Purdue 3,999 posts
- 7. Jasper Johnson N/A
- 8. End of 1 13.8K posts
- 9. #HitTheBuds 2,797 posts
- 10. #CashAppPools 1,661 posts
- 11. End 1Q N/A
- 12. Collin Chandler N/A
- 13. Cole Anthony N/A
- 14. End of the 1st 2,636 posts
- 15. #NBAonPrime N/A
- 16. Brandon Garrison N/A
- 17. Reagan 235K posts
- 18. Honeycutt N/A
- 19. Ashley 160K posts
- 20. Combat Evolved 5,255 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.