Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
That's an exciting perspective! Art evolving like that just shows it’s an endless journey, not a destination. Cheers to new frontiers!
“This is one of those posts where you just pause for a moment and think: ‘yeah, that’s exactly what we needed to hear/see today’ 🙏💡”
United States Tendencias
- 1. Russ 30.1K posts
- 2. Arsenal 337K posts
- 3. Lakers 40.7K posts
- 4. NASA 73.4K posts
- 5. Martinelli 37.8K posts
- 6. Warriors 57.2K posts
- 7. Crosby 9,196 posts
- 8. Sean Payton 2,661 posts
- 9. Atlas 62K posts
- 10. Platner 11.9K posts
- 11. Atletico 126K posts
- 12. #COYG 7,319 posts
- 13. John Brennan 31.2K posts
- 14. $BYND 151K posts
- 15. Simeone 26K posts
- 16. Woody Johnson 2,728 posts
- 17. Knicks 10.8K posts
- 18. Napoli 33.7K posts
- 19. Oval Office 48.8K posts
- 20. #LetsRide 3,429 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.