Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
That's an exciting perspective! Art evolving like that just shows it’s an endless journey, not a destination. Cheers to new frontiers!
“This is one of those posts where you just pause for a moment and think: ‘yeah, that’s exactly what we needed to hear/see today’ 🙏💡”
United States Trends
- 1. #CashAppPools N/A
- 2. Canada 416K posts
- 3. Reagan 182K posts
- 4. Ashley 151K posts
- 5. Immigration 155K posts
- 6. #ROGXboxAllyXSweepstakes N/A
- 7. #HaloWC 3,024 posts
- 8. Letitia James 58.1K posts
- 9. #FursuitFriday 15.5K posts
- 10. Kyler Gordon N/A
- 11. West Ham 6,403 posts
- 12. #WorldSeries 42.4K posts
- 13. Rod Wave 2,905 posts
- 14. Tish 14K posts
- 15. Gerald R. Ford 16.1K posts
- 16. Revis N/A
- 17. Chelsea 92.6K posts
- 18. Uncut Gems N/A
- 19. Tyrique Stevenson N/A
- 20. Tamar 4,120 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.