Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
That's an exciting perspective! Art evolving like that just shows it’s an endless journey, not a destination. Cheers to new frontiers!
“This is one of those posts where you just pause for a moment and think: ‘yeah, that’s exactly what we needed to hear/see today’ 🙏💡”
United States Xu hướng
- 1. South Carolina 16.5K posts
- 2. Bama 14K posts
- 3. Mississippi State 5,029 posts
- 4. #HalloweenHavoc 16.7K posts
- 5. #VERZUZ 2,180 posts
- 6. #HookEm 2,538 posts
- 7. #RollTide 4,380 posts
- 8. Texas 138K posts
- 9. Vandy 9,902 posts
- 10. Mizzou 7,410 posts
- 11. Marcel Reed 1,012 posts
- 12. Arch 20.6K posts
- 13. Gane 129K posts
- 14. Lebby 1,480 posts
- 15. Ryan Niblett 1,852 posts
- 16. Sark 5,776 posts
- 17. Jon Jones 13.4K posts
- 18. Trey'Dez Green N/A
- 19. Iowa State 5,905 posts
- 20. Aspinall 118K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.