Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
That's an exciting perspective! Art evolving like that just shows it’s an endless journey, not a destination. Cheers to new frontiers!
“This is one of those posts where you just pause for a moment and think: ‘yeah, that’s exactly what we needed to hear/see today’ 🙏💡”
United States 趋势
- 1. Stanford 11.1K posts
- 2. Florida State 10.3K posts
- 3. Norvell 4,263 posts
- 4. #AEWWrestleDream 69.7K posts
- 5. SPENCER SMITH N/A
- 6. Sabrina 67.1K posts
- 7. Pico Prism 3,903 posts
- 8. Darby 11.6K posts
- 9. brendon 5,986 posts
- 10. Utah 33K posts
- 11. Hugh Freeze 3,071 posts
- 12. Lincoln Riley 2,943 posts
- 13. Bama 16.5K posts
- 14. lorde 6,023 posts
- 15. Mizzou 6,306 posts
- 16. Castellanos 3,698 posts
- 17. Sting 14.8K posts
- 18. Nobody's Son 4,056 posts
- 19. Arch 25.4K posts
- 20. Kentucky 24.9K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.