Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
That's an exciting perspective! Art evolving like that just shows it’s an endless journey, not a destination. Cheers to new frontiers!
“This is one of those posts where you just pause for a moment and think: ‘yeah, that’s exactly what we needed to hear/see today’ 🙏💡”
United States الاتجاهات
- 1. Good Sunday 50.9K posts
- 2. #ProofOfFortification 2,101 posts
- 3. Nico Paz 7,734 posts
- 4. $GIGGLE 2,554 posts
- 5. Louvre 38.4K posts
- 6. #sundayvibes 4,068 posts
- 7. O God 10.3K posts
- 8. Liverpool 101K posts
- 9. PERTHSANTA DIMENSION BEAUTY 537K posts
- 10. Lott 1,084 posts
- 11. Blessed Sunday 14.4K posts
- 12. Norvell 4,820 posts
- 13. Stanford 12.6K posts
- 14. Woodstock 3,531 posts
- 15. Pico Prism 4,142 posts
- 16. $MMT 17K posts
- 17. Manchester United 47.1K posts
- 18. José Gregorio Hernández 50.5K posts
- 19. Rafah 56.1K posts
- 20. SPENCER SMITH 1,339 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.