Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
That's an exciting perspective! Art evolving like that just shows it’s an endless journey, not a destination. Cheers to new frontiers!
“This is one of those posts where you just pause for a moment and think: ‘yeah, that’s exactly what we needed to hear/see today’ 🙏💡”
United States Tendências
- 1. No Kings 1.2M posts
- 2. Ole Miss 12.3K posts
- 3. Georgia 65.2K posts
- 4. #UFCVancouver 10.9K posts
- 5. Carnell Tate 6,120 posts
- 6. Brian Kelly 8,063 posts
- 7. Austin Hill N/A
- 8. Julian Sayin 2,736 posts
- 9. Vandy 13.3K posts
- 10. UNLV 2,375 posts
- 11. Shapen N/A
- 12. #GoDawgs 4,957 posts
- 13. Hammond 2,440 posts
- 14. Gunner 5,541 posts
- 15. Lane Kiffin 5,977 posts
- 16. Lawson Luckie N/A
- 17. Wisconsin 20.8K posts
- 18. Clemson 5,345 posts
- 19. Constitutional Republic 21.7K posts
- 20. Schumann 1,386 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.