Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
That's an exciting perspective! Art evolving like that just shows it’s an endless journey, not a destination. Cheers to new frontiers!
“This is one of those posts where you just pause for a moment and think: ‘yeah, that’s exactly what we needed to hear/see today’ 🙏💡”
United States 트렌드
- 1. Wirtz 40.6K posts
- 2. Elander 3,018 posts
- 3. Tosin 8,095 posts
- 4. Danny White 2,575 posts
- 5. $TSLA 43K posts
- 6. Ajax 68.1K posts
- 7. Tony Vitello 11.8K posts
- 8. Caicedo 17.6K posts
- 9. East Wing 139K posts
- 10. Estevao 23.6K posts
- 11. #YesOnProp50 5,862 posts
- 12. Enzo 28.1K posts
- 13. SNAP 657K posts
- 14. Ekitike 22.9K posts
- 15. Frankfurt 45.3K posts
- 16. Frank Anderson N/A
- 17. Hamburger Helper N/A
- 18. Juve 17K posts
- 19. Vini 18.6K posts
- 20. Vicario 2,068 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.