Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Tren
- 1. Jamaica 196K posts
- 2. Tucker 87.3K posts
- 3. #csm218 3,190 posts
- 4. Nelson 26.9K posts
- 5. #NationalFirstRespondersDay N/A
- 6. jungkook 1.13M posts
- 7. Wikipedia 97.5K posts
- 8. Grokipedia 154K posts
- 9. Nokia 11.3K posts
- 10. $NOK 2,577 posts
- 11. Chris Evans 4,791 posts
- 12. Hurricane Melissa 149K posts
- 13. Tylenol 21K posts
- 14. #gachiakuta154 1,172 posts
- 15. Wired 19.2K posts
- 16. Fuentes 67.3K posts
- 17. #DragonBall40th 4,275 posts
- 18. Eastern Pacific 11.5K posts
- 19. Blue Angels N/A
- 20. Taco Tuesday 14.6K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.