Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States الاتجاهات
- 1. Clippers 13.2K posts
- 2. Harden 9,551 posts
- 3. #DWTS 49K posts
- 4. Ty Lue 1,390 posts
- 5. Giannis 28K posts
- 6. Kawhi 3,422 posts
- 7. Huda 6,292 posts
- 8. #RHOSLC 7,259 posts
- 9. Whitney 15.3K posts
- 10. Markstrom 1,676 posts
- 11. Brunson 7,112 posts
- 12. #DearOlandria N/A
- 13. Chris Paul 1,526 posts
- 14. Zubac 1,636 posts
- 15. Askarov N/A
- 16. Caden 8,053 posts
- 17. Ryan Rollins 2,960 posts
- 18. Connor Bedard 4,869 posts
- 19. Alix 6,647 posts
- 20. Brook Lopez N/A
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.