Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Tendances
- 1. #DWTS 25.8K posts
- 2. Elaine 42.3K posts
- 3. #RHOSLC 4,728 posts
- 4. Whitney 9,083 posts
- 5. Giannis 11.7K posts
- 6. #WWENXT 13K posts
- 7. Ezra 6,780 posts
- 8. Flyers 8,223 posts
- 9. Ryan Rollins 1,058 posts
- 10. Don Lemon 8,437 posts
- 11. Alix 3,777 posts
- 12. Derek 20.7K posts
- 13. Caden 5,144 posts
- 14. Zegras 1,283 posts
- 15. #FrozenFrenzy N/A
- 16. Owen Power N/A
- 17. Alex Sarr 1,218 posts
- 18. Carrie Ann N/A
- 19. Markstrom N/A
- 20. Sorokin N/A
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.