Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Trendler
- 1. SNAP 1M posts
- 2. Don Lemon 3,851 posts
- 3. Jamaica 255K posts
- 4. $NVDA 85.2K posts
- 5. Nelson 29.2K posts
- 6. #LumioseOOTD N/A
- 7. Tucker 99.5K posts
- 8. #MarcelReed N/A
- 9. Wikipedia 121K posts
- 10. Nokia 15.5K posts
- 11. Riley Gaines 105K posts
- 12. Amare 2,476 posts
- 13. #NationalFirstRespondersDay 1,522 posts
- 14. Western Union 5,771 posts
- 15. Fuentes 79.7K posts
- 16. Hurricane Melissa 183K posts
- 17. Senate Democrats 61.8K posts
- 18. Queen Latifah 1,138 posts
- 19. New Hope 34.9K posts
- 20. Jackie Robinson 1,700 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.