Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Trendy
- 1. Game 7 69.6K posts
- 2. Kawhi 6,126 posts
- 3. Glasnow 6,189 posts
- 4. Barger 5,761 posts
- 5. Ja Morant 4,634 posts
- 6. Bulls 30.9K posts
- 7. Roki 7,491 posts
- 8. #RipCity N/A
- 9. #LetsGoDodgers 11K posts
- 10. Grizzlies 6,972 posts
- 11. Yamamoto 34.3K posts
- 12. GAME SEVEN 7,183 posts
- 13. Justin Dean 2,035 posts
- 14. Clement 5,097 posts
- 15. Rojas 10.9K posts
- 16. #BostonBlue 4,554 posts
- 17. #DodgersWin 5,278 posts
- 18. Teoscar 2,549 posts
- 19. Joe Carter 1,325 posts
- 20. Luka Doncic 15.7K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.