Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Trends
- 1. Ohtani 74.3K posts
- 2. #WorldSeries 78.9K posts
- 3. Draymond 3,137 posts
- 4. Mookie 9,109 posts
- 5. #Dodgers 13.9K posts
- 6. Chiefs 80.3K posts
- 7. Vladdy 6,849 posts
- 8. Edman 6,279 posts
- 9. #WWERaw 44.6K posts
- 10. Mahomes 24.9K posts
- 11. Mariota 7,758 posts
- 12. Grokipedia 35.3K posts
- 13. Treinen 2,946 posts
- 14. Freddie 11.8K posts
- 15. Terry 23.6K posts
- 16. Terry 23.6K posts
- 17. Kelce 16.7K posts
- 18. Schneider 7,899 posts
- 19. Teoscar 7,233 posts
- 20. Rashee Rice 4,070 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.