Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States 趋势
- 1. Jamaica 184K posts
- 2. #csm218 1,635 posts
- 3. Tucker 83K posts
- 4. #NationalFirstRespondersDay N/A
- 5. jungkook 1.08M posts
- 6. Wikipedia 91.1K posts
- 7. Nelson 26.1K posts
- 8. Grokipedia 146K posts
- 9. #gachiakuta154 N/A
- 10. #DragonBall40th 3,739 posts
- 11. Hurricane Melissa 143K posts
- 12. Eastern Pacific 9,563 posts
- 13. Taco Tuesday 13.9K posts
- 14. Atlantic 36.1K posts
- 15. Tylenol 20.5K posts
- 16. MONAD BOXES 3,296 posts
- 17. #tuesdayvibe 2,948 posts
- 18. $MSFT 51.3K posts
- 19. Fuentes 63.3K posts
- 20. House Oversight Committee 18.2K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.