Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Tendenze
- 1. #AEWDynamite 19.5K posts
- 2. Knicks 29.5K posts
- 3. Maxey 5,196 posts
- 4. Sixers 14.8K posts
- 5. Embiid 10.9K posts
- 6. Clippers 5,965 posts
- 7. #Survivor49 2,304 posts
- 8. Celtics 23.1K posts
- 9. Cavs 15.2K posts
- 10. #SistasOnBET 2,154 posts
- 11. Donovan Mitchell 2,676 posts
- 12. Brunson 6,609 posts
- 13. Pistons 5,595 posts
- 14. #NewYorkForever 3,034 posts
- 15. Pritchard 1,716 posts
- 16. Hornets 9,481 posts
- 17. Jarrett Allen 1,131 posts
- 18. Athena 7,921 posts
- 19. Cooper Flagg 7,819 posts
- 20. Wemby 8,685 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.