Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Trendy
- 1. $SWC 2,437 posts
- 2. #UFC321 66.6K posts
- 3. Almeida 49.9K posts
- 4. Ole Miss 10.7K posts
- 5. Volkov 42.3K posts
- 6. Mateer 2,014 posts
- 7. Oklahoma 15.4K posts
- 8. UCLA 7,471 posts
- 9. Arbuckle 1,930 posts
- 10. Umar 22.1K posts
- 11. Lane Kiffin 4,939 posts
- 12. Hugh Freeze 1,211 posts
- 13. Jackson Arnold N/A
- 14. Northwestern 5,408 posts
- 15. #Huskers 1,170 posts
- 16. Bautista 40.1K posts
- 17. #iufb 2,173 posts
- 18. Lamar 17.8K posts
- 19. Cunha 82.4K posts
- 20. Anthony Taylor 12.8K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.