Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States トレンド
- 1. Russ 30.3K posts
- 2. Arsenal 340K posts
- 3. Lakers 41K posts
- 4. NASA 73.9K posts
- 5. Sean Payton 2,767 posts
- 6. Martinelli 38.3K posts
- 7. Warriors 57.7K posts
- 8. Crosby 9,294 posts
- 9. Atlas 62.3K posts
- 10. Platner 12.1K posts
- 11. Atletico 127K posts
- 12. #COYG 7,393 posts
- 13. John Brennan 31.5K posts
- 14. Simeone 26.4K posts
- 15. Woody Johnson 2,744 posts
- 16. $BYND 152K posts
- 17. Knicks 10.9K posts
- 18. Oval Office 49.3K posts
- 19. Napoli 34K posts
- 20. #LetsRide 3,548 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.