Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States 트렌드
- 1. Chauncey Billups 53.9K posts
- 2. Damon Jones 13.3K posts
- 3. #7_years_with_ATEEZ 56K posts
- 4. Mafia 93.6K posts
- 5. #에이티즈_7주년_항해는_계속된다 44.1K posts
- 6. #A_TO_Z 43.6K posts
- 7. Kash Patel 35.9K posts
- 8. 5sos 30.8K posts
- 9. Toronto Rangers 2,124 posts
- 10. Gilbert Arenas 4,899 posts
- 11. The FBI 141K posts
- 12. #FalloutDay 2,684 posts
- 13. Kirby Air Riders 7,194 posts
- 14. Adam Silver 4,250 posts
- 15. The NBA 188K posts
- 16. Changpeng Zhao 7,943 posts
- 17. Gambling 114K posts
- 18. La Cosa Nostra 4,839 posts
- 19. Sakurai 10.7K posts
- 20. Feds 22.4K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.