Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Trendler
- 1. Rashford 29.8K posts
- 2. Fermin 51.6K posts
- 3. White House 459K posts
- 4. ChatGPT Atlas 6,038 posts
- 5. Crosby 5,299 posts
- 6. #pilotstwtselfieday 1,270 posts
- 7. Woody Johnson 1,498 posts
- 8. Lakers 33K posts
- 9. Olympiacos 39.1K posts
- 10. Kurt Suzuki 2,180 posts
- 11. Barca 66.8K posts
- 12. Lamine 26.4K posts
- 13. John Brennan 13.5K posts
- 14. NASA 64.4K posts
- 15. #ScarierThanHalloween N/A
- 16. #TrumpHatesOurHealthCare 4,638 posts
- 17. Barcelona 148K posts
- 18. Chrome 14K posts
- 19. Warriors 52.2K posts
- 20. #JUNGKOOKXCALVINKLEIN 61.6K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.