Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Tendências
- 1. Prince Andrew 24.6K posts
- 2. $AMZN 46.5K posts
- 3. Ryan Clark 2,657 posts
- 4. Rhule 5,296 posts
- 5. Sydney Sweeney 103K posts
- 6. Happy Halloween 283K posts
- 7. Scream 7 41.8K posts
- 8. Usha 31.9K posts
- 9. #Prop50VoteYes 4,942 posts
- 10. Somalia 57.5K posts
- 11. $AAPL 82.2K posts
- 12. Necas 2,736 posts
- 13. Andrew Mountbatten Windsor 5,759 posts
- 14. Royal Lodge 6,007 posts
- 15. Heritage 41.8K posts
- 16. Bill Kristol 1,439 posts
- 17. Poot 12.5K posts
- 18. Animal Crossing 31.3K posts
- 19. Billie 46.2K posts
- 20. Buckingham Palace 6,102 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.