Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Trends
- 1. Good Tuesday 22.2K posts
- 2. White House 106K posts
- 3. #tuesdayvibe 1,354 posts
- 4. Texans 39K posts
- 5. World Series 118K posts
- 6. Cobie 35.2K posts
- 7. Sanae Takaichi 62.7K posts
- 8. #Talus_Labs N/A
- 9. Seattle 52K posts
- 10. Blue Jays 101K posts
- 11. Mariners 95.3K posts
- 12. CJ Stroud 6,998 posts
- 13. Seahawks 38.1K posts
- 14. Nick Caley 2,766 posts
- 15. East Wing 77.6K posts
- 16. LA Knight 8,911 posts
- 17. Springer 70.7K posts
- 18. Joe Carter 3,303 posts
- 19. Dodgers in 5 2,317 posts
- 20. Coinbase 50.9K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.