Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States الاتجاهات
- 1. Halo 100K posts
- 2. PlayStation 46.6K posts
- 3. #CashAppPools 1,560 posts
- 4. #HitTheBuds 1,749 posts
- 5. Canada 454K posts
- 6. #WorldSeries 48.2K posts
- 7. Reagan 216K posts
- 8. Combat Evolved 4,096 posts
- 9. Ashley 155K posts
- 10. #CostumeInADash N/A
- 11. Megan 68.9K posts
- 12. West Ham 20.9K posts
- 13. Reichel 2,154 posts
- 14. #CashAppFriday N/A
- 15. Tish 17.6K posts
- 16. $ASST 9,073 posts
- 17. Letitia James 62.3K posts
- 18. Meek 4,011 posts
- 19. Master Chief 5,319 posts
- 20. Revis N/A
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.