Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Trendler
- 1. #GrandEgyptianMuseum 25.6K posts
- 2. #GEM𓅓 7,086 posts
- 3. #Talus_Labs 1,002 posts
- 4. Game 7 75.1K posts
- 5. #capcutlovers N/A
- 6. jungkook 823K posts
- 7. Happy New Month 163K posts
- 8. Kawhi 8,058 posts
- 9. Ja Morant 5,673 posts
- 10. vmin 4,228 posts
- 11. Barger 6,071 posts
- 12. Glasnow 6,769 posts
- 13. Bulls 31.9K posts
- 14. Justin Dean 2,590 posts
- 15. Halloween 2025 198K posts
- 16. Tinubu 45.3K posts
- 17. #RipCity N/A
- 18. Grizzlies 7,343 posts
- 19. Roki 7,720 posts
- 20. Rojas 11.4K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.