Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Tendances
- 1. Saquon 11.4K posts
- 2. Nick Mangold 21.7K posts
- 3. Vini 100K posts
- 4. #FlyEaglesFly 5,497 posts
- 5. Tush Push 7,981 posts
- 6. James Cook 1,271 posts
- 7. Lamine 238K posts
- 8. #ElClasico 93.1K posts
- 9. Go Birds 8,109 posts
- 10. Ravens 32.8K posts
- 11. Myles Garrett 1,265 posts
- 12. Madrid 528K posts
- 13. Mike Green 1,293 posts
- 14. #BillsMafia 5,396 posts
- 15. Andy Dalton 2,630 posts
- 16. Barca 175K posts
- 17. Tyler Nubin N/A
- 18. #NYGvsPHI N/A
- 19. Fermin 55.3K posts
- 20. Derrick Henry 1,482 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.