Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Xu hướng
- 1. #UFC321 98.5K posts
- 2. Aspinall 93.1K posts
- 3. Jon Jones 3,369 posts
- 4. Gane 107K posts
- 5. Liverpool 114K posts
- 6. Mateer 5,373 posts
- 7. $SWC 2,733 posts
- 8. Ole Miss 12.8K posts
- 9. Dern 60.8K posts
- 10. Almeida 60.7K posts
- 11. Iowa 15.1K posts
- 12. Brentford 48.6K posts
- 13. Arbuckle 2,823 posts
- 14. Lane Kiffin 6,561 posts
- 15. June Lockhart 2,719 posts
- 16. Umar 25.5K posts
- 17. Volkov 53.8K posts
- 18. Oklahoma 17.9K posts
- 19. Gophers 2,247 posts
- 20. Slot 86.6K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.