Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Trends
- 1. Austin Reaves 43.6K posts
- 2. Steelers 84.7K posts
- 3. Packers 66.4K posts
- 4. Tomlin 12.4K posts
- 5. Tucker Kraft 15.5K posts
- 6. Jordan Love 16.7K posts
- 7. Derry 19.8K posts
- 8. #GoPackGo 10.7K posts
- 9. #BaddiesAfricaReunion 9,628 posts
- 10. #LakeShow 3,739 posts
- 11. Pretty P 4,031 posts
- 12. Zayne 20.2K posts
- 13. #breachlan2 2,834 posts
- 14. Dolly 12.6K posts
- 15. #LaGranjaVIP 70.5K posts
- 16. Rodgers 38.6K posts
- 17. Teryl Austin 2,173 posts
- 18. Sabonis 2,480 posts
- 19. yixing 9,667 posts
- 20. yeonjun 51.4K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.