Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Tren
- 1. RIP Beef 1,131 posts
- 2. SNAP 664K posts
- 3. #HardRockBet 4,453 posts
- 4. Jamaica 96.7K posts
- 5. Friendly 57K posts
- 6. McCreary 2,612 posts
- 7. MRIs 3,040 posts
- 8. #IDontWantToOverreactBUT 6,503 posts
- 9. Hurricane Melissa 57.8K posts
- 10. 53 Republicans 1,981 posts
- 11. $ZOOZ 5,496 posts
- 12. #ChelleyxTrueReligion 3,728 posts
- 13. $NXXT 3,490 posts
- 14. John Dickerson 1,412 posts
- 15. #MondayMotivation 44.4K posts
- 16. Jack DeJohnette 3,269 posts
- 17. Sports Equinox 8,089 posts
- 18. Rand 33.1K posts
- 19. #NationalBlackCatDay 3,500 posts
- 20. Chapman 3,829 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.