Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Tendências
- 1. #SmackDown 20.7K posts
- 2. #WorldSeries 67.8K posts
- 3. Snell 7,417 posts
- 4. Cole Anthony 1,442 posts
- 5. Halo 137K posts
- 6. Celtics 18K posts
- 7. Darryn Peterson 1,653 posts
- 8. #TheLastDriveIn 1,116 posts
- 9. Jade Cargill 4,642 posts
- 10. Knicks 21.7K posts
- 11. Purdue 6,348 posts
- 12. PlayStation 64.6K posts
- 13. Grizzlies 3,580 posts
- 14. Yesavage 7,203 posts
- 15. Kyshawn George N/A
- 16. Paolo 10.9K posts
- 17. Zelina 1,460 posts
- 18. #LetsGoDodgers 6,014 posts
- 19. Xbox 77.6K posts
- 20. Zion 15.7K posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.