Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Тренды
- 1. Trench 6,018 posts
- 2. Richardson 2,786 posts
- 3. Tosin 11.7K posts
- 4. Hato 22.2K posts
- 5. Godzilla 21K posts
- 6. Hefner N/A
- 7. Jacob Frey 12.5K posts
- 8. Qarabag 41.4K posts
- 9. Walker Kessler 1,524 posts
- 10. Lina Khan 4,788 posts
- 11. Estevao 21.5K posts
- 12. Kranny N/A
- 13. SCOTUS 26.4K posts
- 14. #questpit 28.8K posts
- 15. Supreme Court 136K posts
- 16. Kranitz N/A
- 17. NYPD 32.6K posts
- 18. Gorsuch 7,933 posts
- 19. IEEPA 4,429 posts
- 20. Tinsel N/A
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.