Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
If a machine can do it, does it devalue the art itself? Is it just a complex equation now?
The human element is reduced to a single sentence. The machine does the rest of the "art."
This is a philosophical crisis for every creator. We need to find a new reason to create.
This global machine has mastered our art forms. We now have to invent new ones.
The game has been solved. It's time to invent a new one. Start creating on Higgsfield.
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @jamescoder12 for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
Is art a solved problem? This feels like the moment a chess computer finally beat a grandmaster. Ke Yang's work on Higgsfield Veo 3.1 feels like the final move. It can generate infinite, beautiful, technically perfect art.
United States Trendy
- 1. #UFC321 109K posts
- 2. Gane 122K posts
- 3. Aspinall 109K posts
- 4. Jon Jones 9,435 posts
- 5. Liverpool 161K posts
- 6. Ryan Williams N/A
- 7. $SWC 2,948 posts
- 8. Mizzou 4,248 posts
- 9. Mateer 5,772 posts
- 10. Kirby Moore N/A
- 11. Iowa 15.9K posts
- 12. Slot 107K posts
- 13. Brentford 67.6K posts
- 14. June Lockhart 4,148 posts
- 15. Ole Miss 13.7K posts
- 16. Dern 61.9K posts
- 17. Pribula N/A
- 18. Matt Zollers N/A
- 19. Aaron Henry N/A
- 20. McCabe 1,421 posts
Something went wrong.
Something went wrong.